decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Kickstarter sued over patent nearing death. | 124 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Kickstarter sued over patent nearing death.
Authored by: dio gratia on Thursday, November 22 2012 @ 06:15 PM EST

Google Scholar Patent US5945058 to avoid issues with the USPTO image display.

You could note one of the two inventors is also listed as the patent practitioner prosecuting the application. One wonders if Formlabs might depose the inventors as a result.

From the Complaint (70 KB, PDF) we see at least claims 1 and 23 are specified as being infringed.

1. A method of producing a three-dimensional object from a plurality of adhered laminae formed from a material capable of selective physical transformation upon exposure to prescribed stimulation, comprising:
supply data representing the object to be formed; forming a layer of material over any previously formed adjacent lamina;

selectively exposing the layer of the material to prescribed stimulation in accordance with the data to form a next lamina of the object and to adhere said next lamina to any previously formed adjacent lamina;

repeating forming the layer and exposing the layer a plurality of times to form the three-dimensional object; automated processing of the data to identify which laminae are identified with a desired geometric feature; and

wherein forming, for at least some layers, comprises utilization of a first recoating style when the adjacent lamina includes the desired geometric feature and comprises utilization of a second recoating style when the adjacent lamina does not include the desired geometric feature.

On the face of it, claim 23 doesn't seem particularly valid:
23. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing of the data is performed by a computer.
Likely lacking novelty even at the time the patent was filed. It's also likely not well enabled even in those 108 pages. From reading through the various claims the distinction might be important.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )