decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
If Germany really was on the ball | 124 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
FSFE welcomes German Government's White Paper on "Secure Boot"
Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, November 22 2012 @ 07:39 AM EST
On the FSFE page there is a link to an article entitled "'Secure Boot': Who will control your next computer?". It is a very good analyses of the problem. In the end, it summarizes FSFE's demands that before purchasing a device, buyers must be informed concisely about the technical measures implemented in this device, as well as the specific usage restrictions and their consequences for the owner. They go on to add...

Furthermore, FSFE strongly recommends to exclusively purchase IT devices which grant their owners full, sole and permanent control over security subsystems (e. g. signature-based usage restrictions), in order to maintain the ability to install arbitrary software and lastly to retain exclusive control over ones own data.

It seems to me that it is pretty useless to recommend that users only buy computers they can have full control over. The consumer (me and you) may have no choice about what is available in the market. Microsoft imposes secure boot via their "Windows 8 Hardware Certification Requirements", so who is going to make such a platform?

In the first article you linked to, "FSFE welcomes German Government's White Paper on 'Secure Boot'", there is a paragraph saying...

The white paper says that "device owners must be in complete control of (able to manage and monitor) all the trusted computing security systems of their devices." This has been one of FSFE's key demands from the beginning.

However, that specific "key demand" is not mentioned in the second article, "'Secure Boot': Who will control your next computer?".

In the end, it was a relief to read that device owners must be in complete control of their computer, even if it unclear that the FSFE made such a recommendation as they say they did.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

If Germany really was on the ball
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 22 2012 @ 06:31 PM EST

They'd also include Mobile Phones, Tablets, Game Machines, and any
other device which has an input/output system

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )