decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
That would not be concise | 52 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
That would not be concise
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 21 2012 @ 05:47 PM EST

Microsoft's role: help convince someone to invest 50 Million into SCOg! That's at the least.

What SCOg did with that money (among other money):

    Initiated action against IBM
    Threatened litigation against RedHat who then initiated action against SCOg
    Initiated action against AutoZone
    Initiated action against Daimler Chrysler
    Initiated action against Novel after Novel had publicly stated IBM/Linux does not infringe the Unix Sys V copyrights of which Novell owns
It should be noted the above list shouldn't be considered complete, I was going from quick memory.

Given:

    Novel was only pulled in after they publicly spoke out after SCOg initiated their lawsuit against IBM
then I'd say:
    If you're going to include Novel - you should include all the others as well
Because MS' involvement with regards the 50 Million investment was prior to the lawsuit with Novell!

With a little research:

    MS first starts supporting SCO by licensing their tech in 2003.
    Later, also in 2003, Baystar invests $50 million in SCO - later it came to light in the Court filings MS' hand was in the background of this deal
    SCO vs Novell started in 2004
As you can see - prior to Novell's issues with SCOg (and vice versa) Microsoft was actively supporting SCOg's attacks against Linux.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )