decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not possible | 52 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not possible
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 21 2012 @ 04:24 PM EST
*sigh* Look, this is what is called confirmation bias in
action. "Apple" (as a corporate entity) doesn't do these
things. Attorneys (for the most part) are calling the shots.
What, you think Tim Cook is making all these decisions? And
you think that Samsung's attorneys haven't abused the
litigation process (as evidenced by court orders in this
court)?

That's the point of what I was saying. Neither side here
trust each other at all. Opposing counsel should normally be
able to work out an agreement over an issue like this
without interference of the court. That they can't speaks
volumes. And it reflects badly on BOTH parties. Depending on
the outcome, it will reflect more badly on one party or the
other.

But given my experience, I have a slightly different take on
what is driving this. Should the results not be what you
expect, will you (1) then retract your prior assertions, (2)
attribute this to bad faith on Samsung's part, or (3) just
discard this evidence?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )