|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 21 2012 @ 04:24 PM EST |
*sigh* Look, this is what is called confirmation bias in
action. "Apple" (as a corporate entity) doesn't do these
things. Attorneys (for the most part) are calling the shots.
What, you think Tim Cook is making all these decisions? And
you think that Samsung's attorneys haven't abused the
litigation process (as evidenced by court orders in this
court)?
That's the point of what I was saying. Neither side here
trust each other at all. Opposing counsel should normally be
able to work out an agreement over an issue like this
without interference of the court. That they can't speaks
volumes. And it reflects badly on BOTH parties. Depending on
the outcome, it will reflect more badly on one party or the
other.
But given my experience, I have a slightly different take on
what is driving this. Should the results not be what you
expect, will you (1) then retract your prior assertions, (2)
attribute this to bad faith on Samsung's part, or (3) just
discard this evidence?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|