decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
consistent codebase across all devices, basically | 397 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Consistent codebase is good. Consistent experience is not [n/t]
Authored by: marcosdumay on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 12:01 PM EST
Nothing here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

consistent codebase across all devices, basically
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 02:55 PM EST

Ubuntu Unity and Gnome 3 Shell are trying to bridge the PC and the tablet, but not to the mobile phone. However, they are doing it incrementally by gradually adding touch friendly features to a desktop rather than putting a mobile phone interface onto a PC. They're trying to find something that is a reasonable compromise for medium to large screens using both touch and keyboard and mouse.

The biggest problem than I see with the Windows 8 approach is that instead of trying to find something that works with both touch and keyboard/mouse, they just included both methods and jerk you back and forth between them. It looks like something they improvised at the last minute once they realized that tablets were going to be big sellers and replace PCs in some applications.

Microsoft originally tried bridging PCs and tablets some years ago by giving tablets a PC desktop interface and used touch to emulate mouse clicks. That failed miserably. Apple and Android are bridging phones and tablets by giving tablets a phone interface. That seems to be working quite well. Now Microsoft is trying to bridge PCs, tablets, and phones by giving all three a phone interface (bodged in on PCs with a peek-a-boo desktop). That seems to be a bridge too far given the current reception.

Personally, I happen to like Unity quite a bit as a desktop interface. It solves quite a few of the fundamental design problems that Gnome 2 had (such as the infamous "find the window" problem) while still retaining most of the familiar concepts and categories of Gnome 2. It isn't however a tablet interface as it currently stands. Canonical plan to continue to evolve it further over the next couple of years. They're not trying to turn it into a phone interface though. I have less experience with Gnome 3 Shell, but I think it's not as well thought out as Unity and the changes it makes from Gnome 2 are a lot more drastic. From a UI perspective, Unity seems to be more of a "fix the design problems in Gnome 2" approach, while Gnome 3 Shell seems to be a "throw everything out and start over" approach.

I think that Apple will try to bring their touch and PC interfaces closer together. However, I think they will use the Ubuntu approach of gradual evolution rather than the Microsoft approach of simply duct taping them together. I don't think that Apple will completely merge IOS and OS/X, but they will come up with a version of OS/X that allows easy porting of many IOS apps (e.g. games) to OS/X in a usable form.

Personally, I would like to see the PC UI become more touch friendly. I have installed PCs in factories for applications which needed a touch interface. However, even if the application itself works with touch, using any part of the OS itself (Windows XP) to check or change configuration settings was absolutely painful and usually required plugging in a keyboard and mouse (which is usually very difficult to do when the PC is part of a machine).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • KDE plasma - Authored by: Wol on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 05:18 PM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )