decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Nice find | 397 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nice find
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 12:59 PM EST
Having just read that report I agree with almost everything in it. The only
issue is the costs seem to low to me, presuming you make a constant revenue/year
over the entire copyright term it is profitable to hold on to the copyright for
as long as possible, and that time range is stil pretty long. It is deffinetly a
step in the right direction though.

It is unfurtunate that this is on copyright not patents though, oh well can't
have everything.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Nice find - Authored by: Wol on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 06:40 PM EST
    • Yeah - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 19 2012 @ 02:03 AM EST
      • Blanket licencing - Authored by: Wol on Monday, November 19 2012 @ 12:23 PM EST
        • Preservation - Authored by: Wol on Monday, November 19 2012 @ 01:04 PM EST
        • hmm - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 19 2012 @ 02:19 PM EST
          • hmm - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 07:14 AM EST
Where's the catch?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 01:24 PM EST
It seems to me, since that the party in question is a home for a lot of bottom
line focused entities, there might be something hidden in the verbiage. So far,
I can't find it but no doubt others will, if it's there.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What's going on here?
Authored by: symbolset on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 04:53 PM EST
This is confusing. They've lost the presidential election, and now they're
being reasonable. That's backwards.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • What's going on here? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 06:23 PM EST
  • What's going on here? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 18 2012 @ 01:20 AM EST
  • What? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 18 2012 @ 12:20 PM EST
What's going on here?
Authored by: dio gratia on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 11:39 PM EST

Not to worry. That Was Fast: Hollywood Already Browbeat The Republicans Into Retracting Report On Copyright Reform.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )