|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 04:15 AM EST |
Sorry I was posting from a mobile device with bad coverage,
and didn't realise that would read badly.
That post relates to two different Apple-Samsung cases.
The comments regarding the foreman relate to the US case
recently "won" by Apple, and the comments about the
"apology" relate to the UK registered design case where
Apple were forced by the court to post a statement saying
that Samsung hadn't copied the iPad.
I'm sure most people here are aware anyway, but with so many
stupid lawsuits going on between the same companies on many
of the same (and similar) issues, it's important to be
clear.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 04:19 AM EST |
| UK Court
Orders Apple to Re-Write ‘Inaccurate’
Samsung Statement
Interesting
that he chose to link only to the article
where he applauded the copywriting,
instead of to this one
where he basically said the UK court was wrong 9and has
since changed his position
Of course changing one's position on
something as events
develop and things become clearer is a good thing, but you
don't show much learning much from it if you maintain that
was always your
position. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 09:54 AM EST |
Of ourselves everyone does :) Except Florian.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
