decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Microsoft v. Motorola Trial in Seattle, Day 2 ~pj | 137 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Microsoft v. Motorola Trial in Seattle, Day 2 ~pj
Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 09:19 AM EST
Not just 720p, but also 480p gets converted (not generally broadcast, but
usually on DVD or such), probably in the DVD player.

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft v. Motorola Trial in Seattle, Day 2 ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 02:58 PM EST
I used to sell TVs. I'd like to point out a lot of people still have their CRT
screens, buying converters or whatever as they need them.

Some even hate progressive TVs; older recordings don't look as good on
progressive tvs due to the limitations of the recording technologies, but
interlaced screens' properties disguise this fact. It's hard to explain to
someone who doesn't have an interest, though. These people are
under-represented on the internet because they're mostly older and want to watch
their old shows or home videos and stuff. You can convert
progressive->interlaced or back, but the CRT screens and similar (like old
projection tvs) have different properties when it comes to displaying the
picture that makes the older recordings look better on the older screens. You
can throw that same content on a new progressive LED screen and it doesn't look
as good. (I mean, relatively, compared to reality- it is a more accurate
picture, but it shows the limitations of the recording technology more plainly
than the old CRTs do. It's subjective.) However they still want to have their
TV service to work on the old tv too. Sold a lot of those digital converter
boxes to those folks.

It's a dying breed though, that cares about these. I'm ambivalent about it
personally; I could see why the corporations want to drop it, though. There's
no growth in that direction because nobody is making new content in interlaced;
all interlaced-related conversions are for dealing with older content or
equipment. There's still plenty of interlaced equipment in use, but someday
it'll all be replaced. Probably not as soon as the guys that make/sell content
and equipment say though...

I'm sorry if I didn't explain it well...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )