decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
RIM offers free voice calls over Wi-Fi with BBM | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Petraeus Affair
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 14 2012 @ 02:21 PM EST
NewsPick

Ignoring the lapse in discretion on extra curricular affairs,
ignoring this is Information Weak, I followed some links, and
was intrigued that the Secretary of Homeland Security has no email;
a Federal case starts because one of the fighting cats was cozy with a Fed;
the FBI clings to J Edgar Hoover's mid-century morality standards;
it is unclear whether the FBI had proper warrants to search Petraus' email;
Google's two factor authentication relies on the luser locking their phone.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Memory" trademark - Apple tells 'app' developers to stop using it
Authored by: TJ on Wednesday, November 14 2012 @ 03:43 PM EST

According to 'Memory' board game trademark threatens several iOS games [gamasutra.com] the German board-games manufacturer Ravensburger is demanding that Apple remove applications from its app-store whose name or keywords use the word "Memory".

Apple is sending notices to several developers asking them to remove or rename Apps that have 'Memory' in their titles. The notices are coming at the request of German company Ravensburger, which claims to hold trademark for the word in several European countries, where it sells a very popular board game simply titled "Memory."
gamasutra goes on to quote one developer:
Darren Murtha, half of the duo behind the popular Preschool Memory Match, tells us that he was forced to remove it from all 42 countries...
According to geek.com:
...that specializes in jigsaw puzzles, but has also expanded into other areas such as children’s books and games. The company owns the trademark to a board game called Memory and has demanded Apple stop offering apps that have the word ‘memory’ in their title or as a keyword associated with an app.

It goes on to say:

Ravensburger owns the trademark in 42 different countries, but not in the US.
I'm unable to find a registration in the U.K. Trademarks database either. The countries affected all appear to be non-English speaking:
Armenia, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Equador, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and Venezuela.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

RIM offers free voice calls over Wi-Fi with BBM
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 14 2012 @ 04:36 PM EST
Research In Motion Ltd. announced Wednesday that it's adding the feature to BBM. Users will be able to switch back and forth from a text chat to a voice call. A split-screen option will let them talk and text at the same time. The new feature is a free update for existing customers and comes months before RIM introduces its new BlackBerry 10 smartphones, which are seen critical to RIM's survival.
Emphasis added.

Why would you need a split screen to talk and text at the same time? I usually don't use the screen on my Android phone for anything while I'm talking on the phone, but I do on occasion have the need to look something up while I'm talking, and when I do I have the full screen available to look up anything I wish to look up on the internet, all while I'm still talking on the phone and not needing anything related to the voice call to be displayed on the screen.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Here is why HTC doesn't pay a cent to Apple
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 14 2012 @ 05:21 PM EST

I've been suspicious of several of the Microsoft patent deals. In at least one
case it looked to me as if Microsoft should have been the one to pay. In fact
in the Barnes & Noble case we do know that Microsoft paid.

Read Microsoft's SEC filings. Look at "Licensing Revenue" and let me
know what you think. I'd like to get some feedback on this.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )