|
|
|
| Authored by: red floyd on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 04:57 PM EST |
I've been thinking this all along. That the Seagate suit was a red herring.
Maybe it was needed to get to the point where they could bring in everything
else.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 05:10 PM EST |
The willfulness of violation of a patent that has not even been issued at the
time of "violation" is also something that will not be particularly
plausible to retain.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: soronlin on Thursday, November 15 2012 @ 08:53 AM EST |
It should be a particularly strong argument.
However the danger is that the jury deliberations are held to be inviolable. If
so then no matter what misdeeds went on behind those closed doors, and no matter
how much Hogan gloats in public, the court will not consider it.
The dire voir argument, although weaker, has more chance of being heard. So it
pays to push both of them as hard as possible.
(IANAL)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
