decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
it's -> its | 209 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections Thread Here...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 19 2012 @ 10:06 PM EST
2nd paragraph following:
A. The Court Can And Should Interpret The Damages Verdicts And Correct Errors

split the hair might thin > split the hair mighty thin

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Corrections Thread Here...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 07:55 AM EST
Original:
asking you to say *they* are right, and you sit there not knowing what some of
what they are saying is even talking about.

Better:
asking you to say *they* are right, and you sit there not understanding what
they are even talking about.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Corrections Thread Here...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 07:59 AM EST
Original:
asking you to say *they* are right, and you sit there not knowing what some of
what they are saying is even talking about.

Better:
asking you to say *they* are right, and you sit there not understanding what
they are even talking about.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

confusing quote blocks
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 09:43 AM EST
See comment of that same title, far below

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

it's -> its
Authored by: jmc on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 10:23 AM EST
The final highlight, for now, is that Samsung has filed a motion to compel Apple
to show it's settlement agreement terms with HTC

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UK trial, patent vs. registered design
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 12:33 PM EST
Is the UK trial referred to the same one in which the judge's reprimand for
Apple's website post included a notation that it was not a trial over a
"patent"? There is a lot of stuff going on so I could be confused,
but I recall the UK judge making a point that the trial was about a
"registered design".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

2144 - Motion to Compel
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 20 2012 @ 09:14 PM EST
Exhibit links are broken

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Difficult-to-parse sentence, beginning "ApplevSamsung-2126Ex13.pdf"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 22 2012 @ 01:48 AM EST
Not an error per say, but pretty hard to read:
ApplevSamsung-2126Ex13.pdf, one of the exhibits that Apple would prefer the court to block, is a deposition earlier this month of Marylee Robinson, who opines as an expert for Apple, kind of stepping into the shoes of Terry Musika, who became ill after the trial verdict and who worked, she says, with her, that people buy Samsung tablets to get the patented features allegedly infringed, causing Apple harm.
Phew!

Might be worth splitting it up, and separating clauses some more:

ApplevSamsung-2126Ex13.pdf, one of the exhibits that Apple would prefer the court to block, is a deposition earlier this month of Marylee Robinson. She opines as an expert for Apple (kind of stepping into the shoes of Terry Musika, who became ill after the trial verdict and who worked, she says, with her) that people buy Samsung tablets to get the patented features allegedly infringed, causing Apple harm.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )