decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why do you think this has anything to do with computer security? | 234 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Why do you think this has anything to do with computer security?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 06:44 PM EST
Sorry, but that's still nonsense. The authenticator doesn't have anything to do
with your computer's security - it's to do with blizzard account security.

An authenticator (the software ones are a little different) is a small hardware
token - a RSA SecurID key that periodically generates a 6 digit random number
based off the current time and a secret seed and displays it on a small screen.
Agreed so far?

That token is (optionally) used in the login process to authenticate you to
blizzard (note: NOT blizzard to you) - if an authenticator is attached to an
account their login system will also prompt you for the current code. Again,
the authenticator is *not* used to authenticate blizzard to you.

The reason they got introduced is that both blizzards account security has been
pretty bad and that targetted attacks on blizzard accounts are quite common
because there's a real $$ market for ingame currency etc that can be harvested
from compromised accounts.

Attaching an authenticator *in no way* mitigates the computer security hole that
is warden etc. They're totally seperate issues. Yeah warden is a hole, but
authenticators have *absolutely nothing to do with that either way*.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )