|
Authored by: jbb on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 01:43 PM EST |
Gmail is simply 'selective'.
I had already read the
page you copied but saw nothing that shed any light on the problem I was having.
I have no idea why a small tarball got nixed. If it is a pure digital
signature then a false positive in such a small file has to be worrisome. If
the problem instead is trying to send a tarred executable script then I need to
use a different email service.
So sometimes there might be a
false positive in the virus checking. I am sure Gmail will gladly refund every
penny you paid for the service. Oh. That's right. It's free. So not much cause
for complaint.
Your attitude is extremely non-productive. You are
saying that whenever a service is free, any bugs or problems should not be
reported. This is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the FOSS approach. In the FOSS
community we pay back by reporting bugs and trying to help get problems
fixed.
By complaining here instead of following your do-nothing approach,
I:
Alert other people to the possible problem
Find out of others have
experienced this problem and
possibly have a solution I can use
Perhaps raise the level of awareness of this problem so
Google actually
fixes it thus improving their Gmail service.
--- Our job is to remind
ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 02:55 PM EST |
And have the recipient save the attachment and
rename
it back to the correct
suffix.
If that does not work, then Google has changed their
approach as I
have sent .exe via .xex suffix.
Of course, it was not a virus
anyway.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|