decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
A great day for freeing cultural heritage from copyright bondage | 234 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UK's plan to landgrab US copyrighted works?
Authored by: Gringo_ on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 12:01 AM EST

I'd never heard anything about that. Sounds like some radical thinking going on. One would expect they have the best of legal advice. I can't imagine they would make such radical copyright reforms without it. Hopefully someone will come along who can tell us what this is all about.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UK's plan to landgrab US copyrighted works?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 02:35 AM EST
Just having read the article, it looks like the business reform bill has a provision to cover "orphan works". The footnote pretty much explains the controversy:
*The phrase "orphan work" can refer to any piece of copyrighted material that, for whatever reason, is missing information about who owns it. In theory, this covers work that deserves to be reused but its owner cannot be traced; in practice, it means just about every photograph or image on the internet, for example.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UK's plan to landgrab US copyrighted works?
Authored by: RichardB on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 04:32 AM EST
It dates from the Hargreaves review of IP law.

Direct link, pdf (recommended reading, if you have a little time to spare)

'"Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators' rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth?" According to Hargreaves "The short answer is: yes.'

One of the recommendations (section 4.52) is to allow works to become orphaned where the owner of the copyright cannot be traced. It proposes creating an electronic registry to make searching for the rights holders easier, in effect broadening the gap between registered and unregistered works.

Photographers, as a group, seem to have come out strongly against this. Presumably they think it's too easy to lift images, and then claim ignorance later.

I'm somewhat sceptical about their views (although I admit not to have studied them in any depth), because in general, if you have a good argument you make it at the time of the review. When special interest groups try to get proposed legislation amended later by lobbying politicans instead, it's more often than not for the general good.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A great day for freeing cultural heritage from copyright bondage
Authored by: squib on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 05:05 AM EST
This is pure FUD from the likes of large commercial image libraries
like Corbis (privately owned by Bill Gates) who have bought
large stocks of old photos. Thus fear a loss of income due to
competition from European libraries and museums who can
now also offer reproduction rights.

These two legal blogs explain the real situation better than I.

Have EU orphans found a caring home?

Orphan works directive approved by EU Parliament

There will certainly be no "firestorm" as the legal remedy for
any discovered infringement in European is simply a 'fair'
royalty. These thing's tend to get settled out of court as it is
unlikely any European court would award costs if the rights-
holder had already been offered a little bit above the 'fair' price.
Commercial publishers already take out insurance to cover
for this sort of thing, so in reality nothing will change.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

LOL Are its authors initials AO? If so don’t take him seriously he like to be controversial :-P
Authored by: SilverWave on Tuesday, November 13 2012 @ 01:46 PM EST
.

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )