decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Re: Google's review by FTC nearing critical point | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Re: Google's review by FTC nearing critical point
Authored by: Tim on Sunday, November 11 2012 @ 11:04 PM EST
Hi PJ,
It may be justified, but it's not the solution. Did you not follow the election? Did you ever hear such malarkey in all your born days? Do you seriously believe that those folks can run or regulate the Internet without destroying it?
I agree that Government is not always the solution, but do you think that we should not have consumer protection laws and anti-trust legislation because they rely on national governments? I would much rather have that, albeit flawed and corrupted, oversight than rely on corporations who's only responsibility is to shareholders and directors (and more worrying, employed executives).

I perhaps do not express my main concerns with sufficient clarity - I suspect that some people see my posts and think "The nasty man is attacking Google, who have given us the wonderful Android", but that is not what I mean. Companies who we distrust give us free, useful, stuff; Microsoft with, say, RTF and ODBC; Apple (with others) CUPS and WebKit. So we are likely to again sacrifice control for convenience, because it is easy. I certainly am not RMS or DMD, but I believe that they have contributed more to the internet and the common good than than, say, Mark Zuckerberg, or even Brin and Page. When Eben Moglen discusses carrying devices around with us which spy on us all of the time, I don't think he means WinPhone 7...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )