decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Google is your friend! | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Google is your friend!
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 14 2012 @ 05:35 PM EST
You have confused me with another commentator. I have pointed at nothing other than the UKIPO, I do not know anything about any Halliburton v Smith so cannot possibly comment on this issue. I do not deny that the UK has some software patents, that is why I posted the link to the UKIPO official guidance on the issue, and as the guidance explains this area is muddied by case law presumably where the UK Courts (Jury's) have got it wrong (personal opinion of course).

The main issue with UK patents, to my understanding, is apparently the term 'a program for a computer is not regarded as a patentable invention to the extent that the patent or application relates to the program as such' in the patent act 1977 , where the term 'as such' is suitably ambiguous to allow those with large wallets to get a hook into the system.
As for the software radio, there are plenty of patents worldwide covering these, and they do not require a computer to operate, (your Mobile (Cell) phone is an example of a software defined radio, as would be a digital satellite TV receiver).
And finally, the UK courts found the patent for the 'slide to unlock' feature to be invalid. See PJ's Groklaw article dated July 4th 2012 Another Spanking for Apple From Judge Posner

My advice,if you have any software patent problems is ignore every thing you read here, and seek the advice of an IP Lawyer. (Oh. and dig deep...)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )