|
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, November 09 2012 @ 04:39 PM EST |
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 09 2012 @ 04:53 PM EST |
"the more furious the Judge is gonna be"
I thought Koh is furious 24/7?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: BJ on Friday, November 09 2012 @ 05:46 PM EST |
Suppose one of the parties knew or discovered early what Hogan had been
involved in. That prob. means they had ample reason to assume the other
party also knew what they knew. Seems to me a matter of strategic sense
and sanity.
None of them speak out. Maybe this is a speculation (gamble) on the judge's
failing to ask unambiguous questions during voir dire.
Or I should say: the knowing party doesn't speak up (poss. thinking "they
don't, we don't"), and the other side doesn't know and has nothing to speak
up about.
Samsung has gone on the record and stated they knew nothing. The
presumed parity in knowledge vis a vis Hogan is now quickly seen in retrospect
as a disparity.
Nothing Apple or the Judge can say to Samsung will take away Samsung's
rightfully strong feelings about his disparity; it's a strong mind that's gonna
tell them: "it didn't play a role".
bjd
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|