|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:31 PM EST |
Quoting:
The court clarifies that this involves not only a description of the invention
and how it works, but rather a much more practical level of disclosure "to
enable a person skilled in the art or the field of the invention to produce it
using only the instructions contained in the disclosure." In this case, the
court finds that Pfizer failed to provide sufficient disclosure,
concluding:....
Yes, this bit of sanity WOULD be helpful this side of the border...for
example software patents would be invalid without source code...
(Christenson)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Charles888 on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 11:16 PM EST |
Did I miss something here? Why is
everybody redacting the name of that
neighboring country?
(I am playing along. Better safe
than sorry! :-)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|