decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The electronic voting machine problem, again | 224 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The electronic voting machine problem, again
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 05:40 AM EST
I'd prefer a system that used coloured and/or shaped plastic tokens than one that issued paper. The blue square token would be the democrat, the red circular token the republican. Voter hits the virtual button, token pops out. If the token doesn't match their requirements, then they can put the token back in the machine and try again. If the token does match, put it in the counting machine which would then sort and stack the tokens.

I think 1mm thick tokens that are about 1cm or so in width would be pretty easy for a machine to count.

If the counting machine stacks the tokens and releases a stack for every 100 votes then it would be pretty easy to check them and have the votes tallied and verified pretty quickly.

Easily verifiable by the voter that they're voting for who they want. Easily countable. Re-usable.

The difficulties I see are that of storage and if there are many different options. If there's only 3 or 4 options then storage wouldn't be a problem. If there's 10 different options then that would be awkward for strage and you might have to get inventive for shapes.

j

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

An official receipt
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 04:59 PM EST
Should NOT have a record of the vote on it.

By all means let it have a barcode, that can then be tallied back to the ballot
paper. We have the same concept here in the UK (they keep a record of the serial
number of the ballot paper issued to you).

But a problem here (easily overcome, but needs thinking about), is how do you
cancel and re-issue a vote?

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )