Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Right up to a point | 224 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Right up to a point

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:07 PM EST

I'm not entirely sure if the contempt order would be from the High Court or the
Court of Appeal, but I believe that it would be from the High Court for the
following reason. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals and varied the
order, but also allowed for further argument to be heard. I *think* that this
means that further argument would be heard in the High Court since the appeals
have been dismissed and the original order issued from the High Court.

Also, I don't believe that the Court of Appeal is itself a court of inherent
jurisdiction, but rather a one established by statute, so if the contempt ruling
would issue from the Court of Appeal the moral above would have to be modified.
;)

Perhaps there is someone familiar with UK contempt and appeals procedure around
who could clear this up?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )