decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Profit does not necessarily equate to volume | 224 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Profit does not necessarily equate to volume
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 08:43 AM EST
Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to say that Apple making more money in mobile
means they are leading in sales volume. I don't think that is the case. You are

correct...they make more money on fewer phones because they have higher
profits.

As for the AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint 'sales', those are new activations so
they do
represent sales to the end consumer...not stocking the channel with units. It's

one of the few times we get a chance to compare Apple's sales (Apple reports
sales to consumers) vs. Android sales (most Android OEMs report sales to the
channel which is NOT the same).

My main point was that Apple is NOT being outsold by 5:1 in countries like the
US. Maybe 2:1 at best, and probably much closer to 50:50. As a result, if the
numbers on Android growth are correct they probably represent growth in the
low-end segment of the market (i.e. 'free' phones in India, China, etc.). Apple

does not compete in that space, while microsoft and its partners does. Thus my
analysis that microsoft is probably more likely to take marketshare away from
Android rather than apple.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )