decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
FRAND and fairness | 224 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
FRAND and fairness
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, November 05 2012 @ 11:28 PM EST

And what gets me the most about all this is, while it's so obvious to all of us, it seems like 99% of the press fail to mention anything at all about this, and all their articles come out without any explanation, making MotorOogle look bad. If I was inclined towards conspiracy theories... but I can't believe it is deliberate when such a wide variety of sources get it wrong. I think people don't understand, and therefore Google is failing to get the message out.

Google - smarten up! or M$FT and the rotten apple are going to eat you for lunch!

I have even thought of collecting all the articles together on one big page, with a line for publication, author, and URL, followed by a brief summary of each showing exactly where each is failing to provide the full perceptive. This would be a good exercise for a journalism class.

I saw this happen before. Do you remember when we kept getting these articles every time some other poor chump OEM had to settle with M$FT on their Android tax? Every time, these articles were saying they expected the OEM was paying $15 per unit or whatever it was. I remember I spent a few hours tracking down the source. All these articles were simply quoting each other. Finally I found an article that attributed this to some analysts in Korea. All this FUD from a single, unverifiable source. You must remember, many of us speculated these OEMs were simply paying a token, or M$FT was actually paying them, but had enough leverage to force the NDA on them.

If you guys over there at the FTC have so much time on your hands you have nothing better to do than try to find some fault with Google, I have a suggestion. Why don't you look into what I just mentioned, or why don't you look for evidence of collaboration between M$FT and the rotten apple in their patent attacks on Google?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )