decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple v. Motorola Dismissed with Prejudice | 224 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple v. Motorola Dismissed with Prejudice
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2012 @ 07:33 PM EST
motorola which has the FRAND patents, also samsung is involved as they have some
FRAND patents apple needs as well. Both them offered a licensing agreement to
apple. FRAND patents have to fair and reasonable, which is a 2 way street and
not 1 way in which apple in this case is one that decides reasonable. If patents
weren't frand then motorola could set a price and apple would be screwed, But
what apple thinks is fair is not fair to motorola. So far apple has set their
price and said they won't pay a cent more. Which show's they don't want to be
reasonable if they have that stand. If this ever goes in front of the FTC it can
really hurt apple's case as they have been unwilling to work out a fair number
since day 1.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )