I particularly would like to know what the judge thought of Apple's proposal to "save" the trial - the idea that the Court set a FRAND rate according to a methodology that both Apple and Motorola will agree to be bound by. Clearly, she wasn't impressed with it. I guess we will see a detailed response to it in her written decision when it comes. So strange how Apple put that, "FRAND rate Motorola will agree to be bound by." Why in the world would Motorola ever agree? I think Apple meant that the Court should make them agree, which of course is a ridiculous notion. You can order someone to do something, but you can't make them agree. Agreement by its very nature is a voluntary act.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• it means "agree to be bound" - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2012 @ 06:33 PM EST
  • And gagged and tied - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, November 05 2012 @ 08:01 PM EST
• Agreement is a voluntary act ... - Authored by: nsomos on Monday, November 05 2012 @ 08:03 PM EST
  • Agreement is a voluntary act ... - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:11 AM EST
    • Agreement is a voluntary act ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 07:38 AM EST
      • Agreement is a voluntary act ... - Authored by: bprice on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 07:30 PM EST
        • HTML (was: Agreement is a voluntary act ...( - Authored by: The Cornishman on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 10:21 PM EST
    • My mistake ... - Authored by: nsomos on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 09:02 AM EST
      • No Problem - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 10:59 PM EST