decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Better, grant Motorola an injunction... | 255 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple v. Motorola - FRAND Royalty Rate Trial in Wisconsin May Be Cancelled ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 01:29 AM EST
Or, since Apple never made a counter-offer before filing the lawsuit, Motorola's
original rate proposal stands and Apple must abide by it....

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple v. Motorola - FRAND Royalty Rate Trial in Wisconsin May Be Cancelled ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 02:10 AM EST
Can Motorola bring this to the attention of the Washington court as information
so the judge can make inquiry as to Microsoft's intentions?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple v. Motorola - FRAND Royalty Rate Trial in Wisconsin May Be Cancelled ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 02:45 AM EST
Apple and Microsoft, losers in the patent game, have run to
the courts to get what they want, despite the FRAND
procedures in getting a license.

As each is likely not to 'agree' to the court's decision,
setting a price or price range, that they do not like, perhaps the court should
set an arbitrary price, so large,
Apple and Microsoft will stay away from the court system.

Sometimes you just need to stop protecting the guilty.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Dismiss?!?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 03:35 AM EST
It should also hit Apple with a fine for contempt of court and let it pay the
opponent's legal costs so far.

It is unbelievable what they think they are entitled to.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Better, grant Motorola an injunction...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 09:31 AM EST
...and make it clear to apple that they dug this hole and
now need to start kissing Motorola's boots.


not only $1 (if they decide they agree), but going forward
only note.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )