decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UK Judges Respond to Apple's Snarky Notice: Take It Down and Tell That It Was Untrue ~pj | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UK Judges Respond to Apple's Snarky Notice: Take It Down and Tell That It Was Untrue ~pj
Authored by: DannyB on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 11:50 AM EDT
I would imagine the judge could impose some constraints such as:
1. the typeface must be the larger of:
1a. no less than one third the size of the largest Apple or any other branding /
marketing on the page.
1b. no less than twice the size of the smallest elements on the page.
2. must be clear, legible and high contrast, in garishly ugly colors that stand
out from Apple's notions and sensibilities of good design.

He could also say that if they don't get it right, there will be an $x per day
fine, increasing on some schedule, while they work to get it right.


---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UK Judges Respond to Apple's Snarky Notice: Take It Down and Tell That It Was Untrue ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 12:07 PM EDT
"Since you can't seem to be able to comply with the court order without
creative interpretation, we'll leave it up to samsung to create the home page
for
apple.co.uk as they see fit. If you fail to keep their exact design, we'll
transfer
the domain ownership, along with the rights to use your trademarks on that
domain".

I know it won't happen, but it sure would be funny.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

one can dream...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 05:01 PM EDT
But I think if they actually did that, they would be found in contempt
immediately, and someone might end up in jail for it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UK Judges Respond to Apple's Snarky Notice: Take It Down and Tell That It Was Untrue ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 08:13 PM EDT
my point was that color:#FFFFFF will be invisible on their home page

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )