decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
got a reference for the 50ms holes? | 241 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
got a reference for the 50ms holes?
Authored by: Gringo_ on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 08:05 AM EDT

I can't give you a reference, though I am sure one could find such statistics easily enough with a well-composed Google search. However, I can give you anecdotal evidence from personal experience. I develop a lot of time-critical multimedia software. Over the years I have made thousands of measurements in the process of optimizing my software, and thereby have gained considerable practical experience with the subject matter at hand.

Though well-designed multimedia software can achieve satisfactory average throughput with file I/O, you cannot count on timeliness of any individual fetch or store operation better than 50 ms, and should develop robustness into your application such that it will not fail even if an individual response is many times that. What I am taking about here is the buffering requirement for any audio or video application.

For example, professional audio applications ideally should run on a real-time operating system, and Windows is anything but. The challenge in interfacing with an audio device is to match the driver's real time buffer servicing interrupt demands to Window's unpredictable file I/O. If this coupling is not correctly carried out, one may find tiny drop outs in a recording or such may be audible. It takes years of experience and a lot of testing to design a sound engine that is impervious to Window's whims. In this context, it is not uncommon at all to seen Windows wander off to attend to it's own priorities for hundreds of milliseconds at a time, even with obvious sources of interference from sources like your antivirus and Windows background file search disabled.

In summary, it is clear that Windows does not give real- time response a very high priority in the list of trade offs an OS has to make to serve the user. I have no experience with Linux, but I speculate that it would be better. For one thing, at a minimum, you don't even need an antivirus on that platform, and people often don't realize how demanding antivirus software is of Window's resources. A very significant chunk of all the gains in efficiency as hardware has evolved over the years is consumed by antivirus software alone.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )