decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
LMGTFY -- No thanks | 258 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
LMGTFY -- No thanks
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31 2012 @ 09:01 AM EDT
Fun game - find an agency that isn't captured.

Good luck.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thank you :-)
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31 2012 @ 11:01 AM EDT
Thank you for a good explaination.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

LMGTFY -- No thanks
Authored by: Tyro on Wednesday, October 31 2012 @ 11:01 PM EDT
That's actually slightly wrong. Regulatory capture requires that the nominal
regulators in return for either past or prospective favors make decisions that
favor a portion of the "thing" so regulated. This is regulatory
capture EVEN IF the decision in also in agreement with the intended purpose of
the regulatory body (though try to find an example of that).

What the "Free Dictionary" described was the common result of
regulatory capture, not the thing itself. (Regulatory capture is most often
implemented by giving regulators a plum job upon their retirement from the
regulatory body, but the particular form of the "bribe" isn't a part
of the definition. In fact it could also be implemented by threats, though I'm
not aware of this occurring.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )