decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Whose Mindset? | 555 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nope - it is the mind set problem
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 07:31 PM EDT
Agreed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Whose Mindset?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 08:05 PM EDT
> should a court be able to impose a penalty which
> consists of "go confess to the court of another country"?

Umm, haven't we already had a strong whiff of that in
MS v. MotoMobi? Or rather the inverse.

It must be time for cases like this to be sorted by creating
a truly International ITC, but I'm having trouble finding a
place to locate it, suitable places like Tristan da Cunha,
or Isles St Paul et Amsterdam seem to be under the control
of belligerents. A bit of time on a desolate sub-antarctic
island with 2800bps might shake some of the stroppiness
out of recent court room divas.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Nope - it is the mind set problem
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 29 2012 @ 08:30 AM EDT
I'm having trouble seeing the effective difference between a claim of
"Apple publicly admitted we don't infringe because a UK court told them
to" and "a UK court found that we do not infringe."

Sure, in the minds of the public there is likely to be a difference, but not in
a court proceeding. I think (IANAL) even a US judge would focus on the foreign
court decision, not the penalty, when deciding whether to take any notice. If
Samsung tried to bamboozle the judge by showing the ad without the court order,
that could be easily remedied by a minimally competent Apple lawyer.

-O4W

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )