decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Monopoly or Market leader, what's the difference? | 555 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Monopoly or Market leader, what's the difference?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 12:49 AM EDT
In the tablet market there is Apple, and there is who? Samsung is
counted at around 5% of US market, Amazon & B&N must have a
decent slice, and below them are dust mice of all other android tablets.

Worldwide figures projected for 2012 are Apple 47M units,
Android 27M. 64% might not be a monopoly, but it's a big number
considering the Android devices include such unspeakables as
Apad, Haipad and worse.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple has a monopoly in tablets... Not!
Authored by: Wol on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 03:25 PM EDT
30% is too HIGH. Let's take your example figures ...

On the golf course, the bosses of Thyssenkrupp and Otis have a tete-a-tete, and
decide to put Kone out of business. With a combined size four times that of
their intended victim, it shouldn't be too hard.

In other words, even 23% should be suspect for monopoly abuse. As I say, the UK
trigger figure is about 20%, because if that's the big fish in the pond it can
easily pick off smaller fry, and if there are two (or more) fish that size they
can easily collude to distort the market.

Saying "over 50%" totally misses the danger of illegal collusion and
cartels. A company with 50% doesn't need a cartel ...

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )