|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:17 PM EDT |
I don't see any reference to a link missing only text missing.
As to the statement it would have been fine if they had left
it at the first 2 paragraphs but the rest just shows they had
no intention of sticking the spirit of the decision. The
notice was supposed to recompense samsung from the false
impression that they copied apple and there is no way what
they posted could be read that way.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Headline shows bias... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:30 PM EDT
- Headline shows bias... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 05:49 PM EDT
- Outside their jurisdiction - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 10:49 AM EDT
- Ha Ha - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 12:19 PM EDT
- Ha Ha - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 07:20 PM EDT
- Ha Ha - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 08:13 PM EDT
- Headline shows bias... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 06:34 PM EDT
- Localization - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 03:49 AM EDT
- Localization - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 02:35 PM EDT
- Localization - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 03:08 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 10:52 AM EDT |
There is a difference in removing the yellow ribbon from the Oak tree and
tying a yellow ribbon around every Oak tree in the forest but effectively the
are identical for Apple's purpose.
For a judge to not think Apple would do something like this shows a naive the
judge is. The judge should have supplied the web page and said "Here ya go,
Apple".
The only way to make someone apologize is to hit them twice with a club and
raise it for a third hit. As soon as you put the club down then the apology
evaporates.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
