|
| Authored by: dio gratia on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT |
Or the description in their 10K.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 05:54 AM EDT |
They were told to publish in not less than 14 point type that Samsung did not
infringe their design. If they don't do that then look for fireworks. Apple like
M$ don't seem to realize that the UK and Europe are not the US. I have a
suspicion that if this case had gone to the Courts in Scotland (different laws
there) then Apple might have suffered a worse penalty. They can add damages
there which are not available to the English/Welsh courts . I'm told that there
is no appeal from a senior court judgement in Scotland in this sort of case. A
certain airline found that out the hard way.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Wol on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 06:02 AM EDT |
What if Samsung pointedly go back to the Judge and ask "shoukld we sue for
libel?". Bit disastrous for Apple if the Judge then says "by all
means - add it to the current lawsuit."
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
