|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 05:58 PM EDT |
The judges final conclusion later in the decision states:
This is a
very fast moving industry and I bear in
mind the risk of prejudice to Apple and
I will require the
statement to be on the United Kingdom website of Apple
corporation for six months.
Can Apple claim that since it says
website here, they are not
obliged to have the statement on their homepage.
This is
playing with words, but I guess that is how lawyers think.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 07:11 PM EDT |
For the nitpickers,
.content { font-family: arial; font-size:14px;
line-height:1.4285em; word-spacing:-1px; }
http://images.apple.com/uk/legal-judgement/styles/legal-judgement.css
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Wol on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 06:49 PM EDT |
Given that the text on the home page, in the original order, was specified as
"no smaller than 14pt", was that part of the judgement overruled by
the Court of Appeal?
If not, then by putting the link in the small print at the bottom, I think Apple
have a problem ... :-)
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
