decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple has a monopoly in tablets... Not! | 555 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple has a monopoly in tablets... Not!
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 10:53 PM EDT
30% is far too low. GE used to say that they would be number one on two in a
market, or get out of it. You could be number three in some markets with 30%.
they had a monoply.

In the Automobile market in the 60's GM had almost 50% of the US market, but no
one seriously thought they had a monopoly because there were several effective
competitors.

Elevators for example have very few companies so the market is approximately

ThyssenKrupp 26%.
Otis 23%.
Schindler 15%.
Kone 12%

While ThyssenKrupp approaches your theoretical 30% no one familiar with ethe
market would ever think them dominant.

The market for railroad locomotives is similarly constrained in North America.
It is effectively GE with 70% and Caterpillar with 30%. Siemens supplies a few
from Europe. In this market I wouldn't bet against Cat which is one of the best
run companies in the word and acquired GM's railroad business as a part of GM's
bankruptcy.

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )