decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Ah, but... | 555 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Ah, but...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 07:34 PM EDT
It was!

Why do you think we're still waiting for this farce to end?

Ceglia's achilles heel was actually going to trial. SCO was smarter... ever
since IBM called their bluff and said "prove it!", SCO embarked on
making sure the proceedings never got far enough to expose all the shenanigans.
BK is a wonderful shield.

So now the perps have all ridden off into the sunset, the paperwork has been
shredded, all the phoney financiers and white knights have recycled their
identities and funds to other projects and the Reciever has piddled away
anything of value to his associates.

I'd say Darl & friends were well advised indeed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Ah, but... - Authored by: RichardB on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 06:34 AM EDT
    • You mean... - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 01:01 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )