Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

"No more than that which is proportionate is necessary" | 555 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Apple have an even greater problem with compliance, I feel.

Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 06:31 PM EDT

Did Apple err in inserting three paragraphs of text between the two parts of the
announcement?

Although the words are all there I wouldn't think that is what the judge
intended.

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple have an even greater problem with compliance, I feel.

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 06:37 PM EDT

Thanks for that PJ. You are more diligent in your reading
than me!
So Apple managed to get the short, succinct statement off
their home page because it would have cluttered it. And then
promptly use the extra space on the linked page to add their
own spin and commentary. Absolutely brilliant.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple have an even greater problem with compliance, I feel. - Authored by: Wol on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 08:27 AM EDT

"No more than that which is proportionate is necessary"

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 05:00 PM EDT

Does this mean that Apple's notice must have equivalent prominence to the extent
of Apple's media libel?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )