decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Seriously? Can you spell Sovereign? | 226 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
US courts right to order actions elsewhere
Authored by: Yossarian on Monday, October 29 2012 @ 07:05 PM EDT
>The German court decided more expeditiously,
>granting Moto an injunction

The German court did not grant an injunction on business in
the US. Why should the US court be allowed to "un-grant"
the injunction? The base of your argument is that federal
judges have the power and therefore they have the right.

*Think* what will happen to international trade if other
countries will adopt the US' approach of "might make right".

It seems like the US learned *NOTHING* from the
Smoot-Hawley Tariff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Act

(The US tried to get out of a recession by heavy tariffs on
imported goods. The act was so successful that a recession
became *the* Great Depression.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Seriously? Can you spell Sovereign?
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, October 30 2012 @ 12:32 AM EDT
The US judge has told Moto not to go ahead with the injunction. IOW he is telling Moto to stay in line, one case at a time, and no running across the street for side orders.

No running across the street?

Seriously?

Do you not see your own hypocrisy?

Can you not see that Microsoft themselves ran across the street?

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I'd apply for the injunction
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 30 2012 @ 12:17 PM EDT
Showing that the usa court asking to wait has no jurisdiction
to ask....
i'm not a lawyer and i know i'd do that....

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )