|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:35 PM EDT |
you don't answer his question. the question is whether or not there's bias
favoring apple in the us courts. your answer is only abstract and theoretical.
i think the fact that Apple being a US company, a symbol of US innovation
affecting all other countries, and leading the design trends plays a bigger role
in
creating this bias than Apple's PR alone.
because these altogether make Apple a proud company for US citizens and are
now rooted in the ego of US citizens (judges/juries what not) in the
international
realm.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 12:25 AM EDT |
You assume that judges and juries
are always rational and are immune
against marketing and PR. It is not
so. If it was, companies would Not
be spending so much money on that.
Unfortunately, if you keep repeating
the same falsehood, many (even most)
people well buy it. It happens all
the time in politics, regardless of
how asinine, irrational,
counterproductive your argument is.
You can always make people super you
to their own detriment.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
