|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:07 PM EDT |
As much as I want to believe it could just be good apple PR in the US I can't.
Sure, it would be easy to believe Apple is innovative if I wasn't so 'technical'
as you put it. However once there was a court case, without more signifigant
bias then what should have resulted from any PR campaign, I can't see any
rational person not saying apple didn't invent all of this. No judge should be
letting there personal beliefs on the 'proper' outcome effect what evidence that
they let into the courtroom. No juror should be able to ignore the evidence once
they see it, it is that simple in my honest oppinion.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:35 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 12:25 AM EDT
|
|
|
|