|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 07:09 AM EDT |
I think, very unofficially also, (this is legal language of
an other country), that
"(eis) In convention" means the original claim(s)
" (eis) in reconvention" means the counter claim(s)
"uitvoerbaar bij voorraad" executable for the moment (I
suppose a possible appeal could still decides otherwise)
" aan de zijde van Samsung" on the site off Samsung
" tot op heden begroot " estimated (or determinated) until
today
" niet is ingetreden " perhaps also did not occur
I don't now why the process costs "on the site of Samsung"
in claim and in counter claim are different.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT |
Concerning PJ's "software is math" comment on the newspicks--the
experts on the subject (patent lawyers and high-paid lobbyists, of course--who
did YOU think I was talking about?) will explain to you that only simple
software is math. When software gets COMPLICATED, then it becomes machinery.
Conversely, complicated math can't be converted into software: it can only be
converted into Intellectual Property.
You might want to remember this for future reference.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
