|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 06:56 PM EDT |
| In the international arena Samsung seems to have fared better overall but in the
US courts (specifically ITC being the latest ruling released ), it
has lost repeatedly. Is there a bias towards Apple in the US or just that the
non-US patent laws/court systems seem to suit Samsung more ? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Charles888 on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 07:03 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:07 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:35 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 12:25 AM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: bilateralrope on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:47 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 10:16 PM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 11:29 PM EDT
- All over - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 12:20 AM EDT
- Time to take this up as a trade war issue. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 02:17 AM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: electron on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 06:40 AM EDT
- ITC ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 07:22 PM EDT
- DoJ Investigating Samsung For Patent Abuse - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 10:32 AM EDT
- Apple Posts Non-Apology to Samsung - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 11:03 AM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Charles888 on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 06:58 PM EDT |
Would any loss convince Apple to
stop the insanity? Of course not.
Here is another action taking
advantage of know-nothing trigger-
happy ITC judges:
mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-
24/samsung-infringes-apple-touch-
screen-design-patents-judge-
says.html
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:41 PM EDT |
--
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Corrections Here - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 07:09 AM EDT
- Corrections Here - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:42 PM EDT |
---
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Honeycomb composites - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 09:18 PM EDT
- "Apple victory as Samsung loses US trade ruling" - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 09:29 PM EDT
- Samsung Infringes Four Apple Patents, Trade Judge Says - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 09:43 PM EDT
- Upstanding - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 05:00 AM EDT
- Upstanding - Authored by: squib on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 05:01 AM EDT
- Upstanding - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 05:41 AM EDT
- Oh I forgot... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 05:48 AM EDT
- Oh I forgot... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 09:19 AM EDT
- In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was worth ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 03:01 PM EDT
- In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was worth ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 03:36 PM EDT
- So... was Lincoln rich or poor? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 03:43 PM EDT
- Wow. Get some new material. - Authored by: stegu on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 05:07 PM EDT
- Imaginary Property - Authored by: FreeChief on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 07:27 PM EDT
- In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was worth ... - Authored by: Tyro on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 08:01 PM EDT
- In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was worth ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 04:39 AM EDT
- In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was worth ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 07:42 AM EDT
- Another hint of the fog. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 10:53 AM EDT
- Upstanding - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 02:33 PM EDT
- CHAMP - lights out - Authored by: albert on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 11:29 AM EDT
- Incredible CSI-Like “Enhance!” App - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 02:51 PM EDT
- Technically Torvalds may be right. Destroying Microsoft is a side-effect - Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 03:40 PM EDT
- Lauren's Handy Guide for Detecting and Dealing with Trolls... - Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 06:25 PM EDT
- Copyright Office ties itself in knots on jailbreaking, media backups, and fair use - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:51 AM EDT
- Have Apple complied with the court order to post an apology on their website? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 06:08 AM EDT
- Samsung Reports Record Profits - Authored by: john-from-ct on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 08:12 AM EDT
- Apple seeks patent for Lightning connector authentication system - Authored by: albert on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 12:39 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:43 PM EDT |
-
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Open Source ARM userland - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 01:31 AM EDT
- Status of Myriad? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 03:30 AM EDT
- No item about Samsung yet on Apple UK website - Authored by: jmc on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 04:35 AM EDT
- Canada - Supreme Court Weighs in on Vetoing Irregularities - split decision - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 10:56 AM EDT
- Windows 8 Survival Guide - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 04:43 PM EDT
- Apple Made iPhone Users Get AT&T, Lawsuit Says - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 06:32 PM EDT
- Apple Officially Granted Registered Trademark For Beatles’s Apple Corps Logo - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 06:58 PM EDT
- The Exonerated: A Lawyer Takes the Stand in His Own Defense - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 08:36 PM EDT
- Huawei Gear Too Complex To Certify Security - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 10:40 PM EDT
- and in the real world - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:56 AM EDT
- Apple's UK Legal Apology - is this it? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 04:20 AM EDT
- Apple's profits, and Samsung's...... - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 04:51 AM EDT
- Rich white Americans squable over ownership of the most famous melody ever to emerge from Africa - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 06:28 AM EDT
- Apple finally "acknowledge" defeat in UK appeal - but still lie - Authored by: jmc on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 07:49 AM EDT
- Off Topic Here - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 03:02 PM EDT
- Oops title - short aapl - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 03:04 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:44 PM EDT |
--
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 11:38 PM EDT |
'The ITC just went the other way,...
“People see what’s happening in the other countries, but here in the U.S., ...”'
I think it has less to do the American courts favouring American companies vs a
broken patent system in the US.
i.e. The PTO has to give the broadest possible interpretation to a patent and
then leave it to the courts to narrow. But the courts are bound to give
deference to a patent even if the PTO never considered that particular
application.
I would say it is an old fashioned "chicken vs egg" except without the
chicken or the egg, lol
It's really an economic decision by the PTO, in that it is much better if
defendents pay to fight a patent instead of them (the tax payer).
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 11:52 PM EDT |
Just watch, the silly iPhone 4s came out, everyone hoped for 4G like Android
had. It didn't.
iPhone 5 comes out, everyone hopes it has a bigger screen, 4G and NFC like
Android, 2 (1-1/2?) out of three ain't bad.
Their customers are grumpy about new iPads coming out, and making the ones they
just bought obsolete.
Everyone who was anyone had an Apple][ when the company started, everyone who
was anyone had an iPhone 4 when the company died.
(it'll be the iPhone 8 or 9 before they are dead, but you get the idea. The iPad
is still dominant, that will prolong their demise for a couple years) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 12:29 AM EDT |
Quote fro news pick on ITC decision " Finally, the decision by the full ITC
can still be appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit"
yeah like that will ever happen....
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: reiisi on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 07:06 AM EDT |
| Reminds me of a song by Chicago, lo, these many years ago. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 25 2012 @ 04:09 PM EDT |
This has to be On-Topic:
SemiAccurate's take on Apple v. Samsung.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
