decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Lights! Camera! Action! | 198 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Lights! Camera! Action!
Authored by: DieterWasDriving on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 07:21 PM EDT

Lights: The very hot, high-powered lights were turned on. They were turned off
between takes because they had a short lifetime due to being run at a high color
temperature. Bright light was needed because it wasn't possible to extend the
exposure time.

Camera: The camera took a few seconds to get up to speed, wasting expensive film
the whole time.

Action: Once the camera was up to speed, the "sound board" was
clapped. The board had hand-written scene information that would be used in the
cutting room. The clapping sound acted as the synchronization pulse so the
sound recording could later be aligned with the images. For the final prints,
the sound was an optical track a few frames offset from the matching image. It
couldn't be on the same frame because the film was fed forward a frame at a
time, stopping for exposure/projection.

Cut: Physically cut the film and stop the camera. That saved the cost of
developing unexposed film, and the waste of exposing frames as the camera came
to a halt. Each scene ended up on its own reel, which didn't need to be
processed if it was not needed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )