decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How many of PolR's articles (as PDF files) stand alone with Creative Commons License? None? Why? | 198 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
How many of PolR's articles (as PDF files) stand alone with Creative Commons License? None? Why?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:05 AM EDT
Upon a quick inspection, it seems that there is a problem with just taking PolR's Groklaw articles and using them freely. As the few that have been made into PDF files that could be used or Printed out, do not seem to have any Creative Commons License in the text of the downloaded, stand alone PDF file?

I just looked at PolR's PDF file linked to in PJ's article, and nope, no creative commons license that I could find there in the text at all? PJ's articles have Creative Commons License, but downloaded, as a stand alone document, I don't see where PolR's PDF's have the same?

Where in any of the pdf's written by PolR, is any Creative Commons License RIGHTS at all... (in the text)?

So, those PDFs in those articles, are then, without Creative Commons License, they are then under plain old copyright law at this point in time, and can not be freely used by anyone else.

To fix the ability of anyone to use PolR's articles, those that are PDF files, then PolR and PJ need to get together, and republish them on Groklaw with the PDF(s) having the proper Creative Commons License that one can read in the text of the PDF. Only then, can someone download the PDF and make a copy of it freely.

Then, someone, we could hire, as a group here on Groklaw, if that were possible to do with PJ's help/blessings, can use them freely.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )