Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT |
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Who cares? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 03:14 AM EDT
|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 04:49 PM EDT |
The tone is only slightly sell shrill. He's still pushing the same message.
Perhaps his handlers told him to tone it down, since he was drawing so much
flack.
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 04:52 PM EDT |
I wonder if Flo is either trying to slow the rate at which he discredits himself
or he is courting new Johns to pay his bills. As for not being so quick to make
himself look ridiculous, it's not like he could speed things up, so maybe he is
just getting tired and slowing the pace?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: designerfx on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 05:14 PM EDT |
impossible. It's been one article and you're going to act as
if a leopard has changed their spots?
Give it a year without being under contract from ms/oracle,
then we might be talking.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: calris74 on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 06:09 PM EDT |
He basically believes that:
"There are many parties litigating against Android (as
everyone should because Android is the scourge of the
universe). They all have lots of patents, all of them valid
and of great value. Android vendors have patents, but they are
all invalid and/or of little value. Even if some/many/most of
the anti-Android patents are deemed invalid, there will still
be enough to doom Android"[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- straw man - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 07:20 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 09:13 PM EDT |
No. It was riddled with errors. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|