|
Authored by: knarf on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 04:58 PM EDT |
What can they possibly submit? Certainly not prior
art
A large wad of cash (in unmarked bills) usually does the
job.--- [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: JonCB on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 10:49 PM EDT |
The usual process (from what little i know) can be summed up
as "what we really mean is this little piece here that isn't
covered by the prior art". The result of which is that the
claims become more focused (so they are harder to apply) and
some of the claims disappear entirely.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 08:57 PM EDT |
What can they submit? Arguments and evidence that the cited references
really are distinguishable from the claim. Arguments and evidence to
provide weight to indicia of non-obviousness (in relation to any rejections
over 35 USC 103), such as commercial success, long felt need, etc. They
can also amend their claims (and lose any claims for previous damages).
There may be some other things I forget at present. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|