|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 23 2012 @ 03:21 PM EDT |
Voting machine provider Hart Intercivic will be counting the votes
in various counties in the crucial swing states of Ohio and Colorado and
elsewhere throughout the country come Nov. 6 — even though it has extensive
corporate ties to the Mitt Romney camp, and even though a study commissioned by
the state of Ohio has labeled its voting system a “failure” when it comes to
protecting the integrity of elections.
[...]
The Project Everest report
went further and asserted that the Hart system “lacks the technical protections
necessary to guarantee a trustworthy election under operational conditions.”
Ultimately, it concluded with words that may prove haunting come Nov. 6: “The
vulnerabilities and features of the system work in concert to provide ‘numerous
opportunities to manipulate election outcomes or cast doubt on legitimate
election activities … virtually every ballot, vote, election result, and audit
log is ‘forgeable or otherwise manipulatable by an attacker with even brief
access to the voting systems.’”
Craig Unger, Salon[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 11:02 AM EDT |
Did the most powerful Republicans in America have the computer
capacity, software skills and electronic infrastructure in place on Election
Night 2004 to tamper with the Ohio results to ensure George W. Bush's
re-election?
April 23, 2007 | Did the most powerful Republicans in
America have the computer capacity, software skills and electronic
infrastructure in place on Election Night 2004 to tamper with the Ohio results
to ensure George W. Bush's re-election?
The answer appears to be
yes.
Bob Fitrakis & Steven
Rosenfeld, AlterNet[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 28 2012 @ 01:32 AM EDT |
The internet has been abuzz since the British website UK Progressive
released a report on how a retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho had gone over the
Arizona GOP Primary Results from earlier this year and discovered widespread GOP
election fraud through what can be called an electronic fingerprint.
He
found that when you break down the primary results in to their component
precincts, and then compare the percentage of each candidate and how much they
gained per precinct, a pattern appeared: This is statistically improbable to
occur even in one election.
What he discovered is that this is not a one
time fluke at all. Instead, he found the tell-tale signature of electronic
manipulation.
Nathaniel Downes, Addicting Info[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
