decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
GM lawsuit over Einstein image use dismissed | 354 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
GM lawsuit over Einstein image use dismissed
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 11:16 AM EDT
What's the duration on copyright again?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It's not a copyright case
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 03:06 PM EDT
It's about the "right of publicity", a separate right. In
some legal theories it's related to the right to privacy.
In any event, the general idea is that nobody can imply that
you endorse their product (e.g. by using a photo of you in
their advertising), without your permission.

California, home of Hollywood, has particularly strong,
clear laws granting a "right of publicity". The Einstein
case, however, was decided under New Jersey law. (The
plaintiffs of course argued that California law should
apply, but the judge disagreed.) New Jersey has no statute
stating how long publicity rights last after death, so this
court had to make something up. The answer: at most 50
years.

This decision isn't much of a precedent: a federal judge in
California trying to interpret New Jersey common law. The
plaintiff may choose to appeal... it'll be a long time
before the question of postmortem publicity rights is
settled.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )