|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 07:16 PM EDT |
Maybe it would help to say something that seemed too obvious to need to be said:
If Hogan wasn't sure what Judge Koh wanted to know, he should have asked. I
agree that Hogan couldn't have been sure that she didn't want to know more, so
it was wrong of him to not at least test that. The most charitable
interpretation possible is that, rather than trying make sure he was doing his
civic duty correctly, he intentionally interpreted things in the way that
favored him. And yes, by doing that, he sabotaged a process that is supposed to
ensure fairness, so it's a big deal. That much has not been in question for me
since I started to learn what happened. For me, the main questions are: will
Apple be able to take advantage of this, and if Samsung gets a new trial, will
it be because of this or something else? I thought that's what we're talking
about here.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|