|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 11:39 PM EDT |
I thought about it, and seriously, it would depend on if it were asked verbally
or in writing. If it were in writing, I would take if very literally, so I would
only answer yes or no. I would expect specific instructions of exactly what they
wanted if they wanted more than that. Verbally would be different. If it were
verbally, I would probably say "Yes," then pause, then give a summary
involving all members of my family that would fit the conditions, while watching
for clues that I had said enough. When we're looking at the transcripts, they
are in writing, so I am probably taking the questions there more narrowly than I
would if they were verbal and directed at me.
Another way to look at how I would approach it if a judge asked me is that it
would be like talking to a doctor. You have to give them all the information and
let them decide what's important. If you're not sure you're supposed to tell
them something, you should either go ahead and tell them or at least clarify it
with them.
As far as Hogan goes, he said that he expected that they might not have him
serve due to his patents, so he knew enough to have some idea of what the
questioning was about. The other thing that we don't know about was what he was
told in addition to the transcripts that we have. I know I had to watch a tape
that explained what we were supposed to do and I think there was some written
information, too. If anything, that information would have encouraged him to
tell everything, not too little. We don't have the morning transcripts, do we?
Something might be in there.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|