decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Hogan is NOT a lawyer | 249 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Hogan is NOT a lawyer
Authored by: Wol on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 03:31 AM EDT
I'll just add to that - hopefully the Judge has learnt that when the next case
comes, she should keep digging, at least until it appears there's nothing left.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Hogan is NOT a lawyer
Authored by: PJ on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 10:14 AM EDT
He didn't need to understand the law to
answer a question honestly and fully. It
isn't physics or something really hard.
Nor was it a trick question. The judge on
more than one occasion during voir dire
told them not only that it mattered if
they were in any litigation before but
also why it mattered. And she asked the
group more than once that same question.

This has nothing at all to do with any
mistake on the judge's part. Putting it
on her is unfair. But it wouldn't legally
alter the part that matters, that he
didn't tell about Seagate and he didn't
honestly answer the question about having
strong views on patents.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )